Meo School Of Research East west north or south education is for all.
The term ―panel data‖ refers to the pooling of observations on a cross-section cross-section of Households, countries, firms, etc. over several time periods (Baltagi). Panel data, also known as longitudinal data, have both time series and cross-sectional dimensions.
They arise when we measure the same collection of people or objects over a period of time.
Econometrically, the setup is
o o
y it
x it
u it
where y where yit is is the dependent variable, is is the intercept term, is is a k 1 vector of parameters to be estimated on the explanatory variables, x variables, xit ; t = t = 1, …, T ; i = 1, …, N …, N .
The simplest way to deal with this data would wou ld be to estimate a single, pooled regression on all the observations together. But pooling the data assumes assumes that there is no heterogeneity – heterogeneity – i.e. i.e. the same relationship holds for all the data.
A panel data set, while having both a cross-sectional and a time series dimension, differs in some important respects from an independently pooled cross section. To collect panel data — — sometimes called longitudinal data — we we follow (or attempt to follow) the same individuals, families, firms, cities, states, or whatever, across time. Hsiao (2003) and Klevmarken (1989)
List several benefits from using panel data Controlling for individual heterogeneity: Panel data suggests that individuals, firms, states or co untries are heterogeneous. Time-series and cross-section studies not controlling this heterogeneity run the risk of obtaining biased results, e.g. see Moulton (1986, 1987). It is often of interest to examine how variables, or the relationships between them, change dynamically (over time). time). By structuring the model in an appropriate way, we can remove the impact of certain forms of omitted variables bias in regression results. Panel data give more informative data, more variability, less collinearity among the variables, More degrees of freedom and more efficiency Time-series studies are plagued with multicollinearity; for example, in the case of demand for cigarettes above, there is high collinearity between price and income in the aggregate time series for the USA. This is less likely with a panel across American states since the cross-section dimension adds a lot of variability, adding more informative data on price and income. In fact, the variation in the data can be decomposed into variation between states of different sizes and characteristics, and variation within states. Please remember me and my teachers and family in your prayers. Superior university Lahore Pakistan
Meo School Of Research East west north or south education is for all.
Panel data are better able to study the dynamics of adjustment. Cross-sectional distributions that look relatively stable hide a multitude of changes. Spells of unemployment, job turnover, residential and income mobility are better studied with panels. Panel data are also well suited to study the duration of economic states like unemployment and poverty, and if these Panels are long enough; enou gh; they can shed light on the speed of adjustments to economic policy Changes. Panel data are better able to identify and measure effects that are simply not d etectable in pure cross-section or pure time-series data. (prof.Balgati&prof:Gujrati)
Characteristics of panel data Panel data provide information on individual behavior, both across individuals and over time – time – they have both cross-sectional and time-series dimensions. Panel data include N individuals observed at T regular time periods. Panel data can be balanced when all individuals are observed in all time periods or unbalanced when individuals are not observed in all time periods We assume correlation (clustering) over time for a given individual, with independence over individuals. o Example: the income for the same individual is correlated over time but it is independent across individuals.
Panel data types
Short panel: many individuals and few time periods (we use this case in class) Long panel: many time periods and few individuals Both: many time periods and many individuals
Variation for the dependent variable and Regressor
Overall variation: variation over time and individuals. Between variation: variation between individuals. Within variation: variation within individuals (over time).
Panel data models
Panel data models describe the individual behavior both across time and across individuals. There are three types of models: the pooled model, the fixed effects model, and the random effects model.
Pooled
model
The pooled model specifies constant coefficients, the usual assumptions for crosssectional analysis. This is the most restrictive panel data model and is not used much in the literature. Individual-specific effects model We assume that there is unobserved heterogeneity across individuals captu red by Example: unobserved ability of an individual that affects wages.
Please remember me and my teachers and family in your prayers. Superior university Lahore Pakistan
Meo School Of Research East west north or south education is for all.
Fixed effects model
The fixed effects model for some variable y variable yit may may be written
y it
x it
i
v it
We can think of i as summarizing all of the variables that affect yit cross-sectionally but do not vary over time – time – for for example, the sector that a firm operates in, a person's gender, or the country where a bank has its headquarters, etc. Thus we would capture the heterogeneity that is encapsulated in i by a method that allows for different intercepts for each cross sectional unit. This model could be estimated using dummy variables, which would be termed the least squares dummy variable (LSDV) approach.( ‘Introductory Econometrics for Finance’ © Chris Brooks 2013) The Random Effects Model
An alternative to the fixed effects model described above is the random effects model, which is sometimes also known as the error components mo del.
As with fixed effects, the random effects approach proposes different intercept terms for each entity and again these intercepts are constant over time, with the relationships between the explanatory and explained variables assumed to be the same both crosssectionally and temporally.
However, the difference is that under the random effects model, the intercepts for each cross-sectional unit are assumed to arise from a common intercept (which (which is the same for all cross-sectional units and over time), plus a random variable i that varies crosssectionally but is constant over time.
i measures the random deviation of each entity’s intercept term from the ―global‖ intercept term . We can write the random effects panel model as
y i t
x it
it
,
it
i
v it
Unlike the fixed effects model, there are no dummy variables to capture the heterogeneity (variation) in the cross-sectional dimension.
Instead, this occurs via the i terms. Fixed or Random Effects?
It is often said that the random effects model is more appropriate when the entities in the sample can be thought of as having been randomly selected from the population, but a fixed effect model is more plausible when the entities in the sample effectively constitute the entire population.
Please remember me and my teachers and family in your prayers. Superior university Lahore Pakistan
Meo School Of Research East west north or south education is for all.
However, the random effects approach has a major drawback which arises from the fact that it is valid only when the composite error term it it is uncorrelated with all of the explanatory variables.
This can also be viewed as a consideration of whether any unobserved omitted variables (that were allowed for by having different intercepts for each entity) are uncorrelated with the included explanatory variables. If they are uncorrelated, a random effects approach can be used; otherwise ot herwise the fixed effects model is preferable.
A test for whether this assumption is valid for the random effects estimator is based on a slightly more complex version of the Hausman test.
If the assumption does not hold, the parameter estimates will be biased and inconsistent.
To see how this arises, suppose that we have only one explanatory variable, x2it that varies positively with yit , and also with the error term, it it . The estimator will ascribe all of any increase in y to x x when in reality some of it arises from the error term, resulting in biased coefficients
The main question is whether the individual-specific effects are correlated with the Regressor. If they are correlated, we have the fixed effects model. If they are not correlated, we have the random effects model.
Fixed effect model verses random effect model Fixed effect
Random effect
Correlation between the individual, or crosssection specific, error component εi and the X Regressor. εi (error component) and the X’s X’s are correlated, FEM may be appropriate If T (the number of time series data) is large and N (the number of cross-sectional units) is small, FEM may be preferable If the individual error component εi and one or more Regressor are correlated, then the ECM estimators are biased
If they are not correlated, we have the random effects model.
When N is large and T is small, then ECM is appropriate If the individual error component εi and one or more Regressor are correlated, then the ECM estimators are biased, whereas those obtained from FEM are unbiased.
Best of luck. Soon ill update this file and elaborate further this topic, because of still I’m in learning process.
Please remember me and my teachers and family in your prayers. Superior university Lahore Pakistan
Meo School Of Research East west north or south education is for all.
Thanks for being with me Take care www.saeedmeo.blogspot.com
[email protected]
1/24/2016
Please remember me and my teachers and family in your prayers. Superior university Lahore Pakistan
