Political power (imperium in Latin) is a type of power of power held held by a person or group in a society.. There are many ways to hold such power. Officially, political power is held by society the holders of sovereignty of sovereignty.. Political powers are not limited to heads of states, however, and the extent to which a person or group holds such power is related to the amount of societal influence they can wield, formally or informally. In many cases this influence is not contained within a single state and it refers to international power . Politi Political cal scient scientist istss have have freque frequentl ntly y define defined d power power as "the "the abili ability ty to influe influence nce the behaviour of others" with or without resistance. For analytical reasons, I.C. MacMillan separates the concepts power concepts power Power is the capacity to restructure actual situations. and influence Influence is the capacity to control and modify the perceptions of others. Separation of powers Charles de Secondat, baron de Montesquieu claimed that without following a principle of containing and balancing legislative legislative,, executive and judiciary and judiciary powers, powers, there is no freedom and no protection against abuse of power. Separation of power must be in such grade, that any of the branches can operate without excessive limitations from the others; but interdependecy between them must also be in such grade, that one single branch cannot rule out the other's decisions. This is the separation of powers principle. Division of Power A similar concept, termed Division of Power, also consists of differentiated legislative, executive, and judicial powers. However, while Separation of Power prohibits one branch from interfering with another, Division of Power permits such interference. For example, in Indonesia Indonesia,, the President (who wields executive power) can introduce a new bill, but the People's Consultative Assembly (holding legislative power) chooses to either legalize or reject the bill. Power projection Power projection (or force projection) is a term used in military and political and political science to refer to the capacity of a state to implement policy by means of force, or the threat thereof, in an area distant from its own territory. The Unit United ed Stat States es Depart Department ment of Defense,, in its publication J1-02: Department of Defense Dictionary of Military and Defense Associated Terms, Terms, further defines power projection as “The ability of a nation to apply all or some of its elements of national power - political, economic, informational, or military - to rapidly and effectively deploy and sustain forces in and from multiple dispersed locations to respond to crises, to contribute to deterrence, and to enhance regional stability.” 1This ability is a crucial element of a state's power state's power in in international relations. relations. Any state able to direct its military forces outside the limited bounds of its territory might be said to have some level of power projection capability, but the term itself is used most frequently in reference to militaries with a worldwide reach (or at least significantly broader than a state's immediate area). Even states with sizable hard power assets (such as a large standing army) army) may only be able to exert limited regional influence so long as they lack the means of effectively projecting their power on a global scale. Generally, only a select few states are able to overcome the logistical difficulties inherent in the deployment and direction of a modern, mechanized 1 I.C. MacMillan (1978) Strategy Strategy Formulation: political political concepts, St Paul, MN, West West Publishing;
military force.While traditional measures of power projection typically focus on hard power assets (tanks, soldiers, aircraft, naval vessels, etc.), the developing theory of soft power notes that power projection does not necessarily have to involve the active use of military forces in combat. Assets for power projection can often serve dual uses, as the deployment of various countries' militaries during the humanitarian response to the 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake illustrates. The ability of a state to project its forces into an area may serve as an effective diplomatic lever, influencing the decision-making process and acting as a potential deterrent on other states' behavior. Political Science Perspectives Within normative political analysis, there are also various levels of power as described by academics that add depth into the understanding of the notion of power and its political implications. Robert Dahl, a prominent American political scientist, first ascribed to political power the trait of decision-making as the source and main indicator of power. Later, two other political scientists, Peter Bachrach and Morton Baratz, decided that simply ascribing decision-making as the basis of power was too simplistic and they added what they termed a 2nd dimension of power, agenda-setting by elites who worked in the backrooms and away from public scrutiny in order to exert their power upon society. Lastly, British academic Steven Lukes added a 3rd dimension of power, preferenceshaping, which he claimed was another important aspect of normative power in politics which entails theoretical views similar to notions of cultural hegemony. These 3 dimensions of power are today often considered defining aspects of political power by political researchers. A radical alternative view of the source of political power follows the formula: information plus authority permits the exercise of power. Political power is intimately related to information. Sir Francis Bacon's statement: "Nam et ipsa scientia potentia est" for knowledge itself is power, assumed authority as given. Many will know that unless someone with authority heeds, there is no political power. The kingmaker is not the king. It is said democracy is the best method of informing those entrusted with authority. [citation needed ] They are best able to use authority without ignorance to maximize political power. Those who exercise authority in ignorance are not powerful, because they do not realize their intentions and have little control over the effects of using their authority. Post-modernism has debated over how to define political power. Perhaps, the best known definition comes from the late Michel Foucault, whose work in Discipline and Punish (and other writings) conveys a view of power that is organic within society. This view holds that political power is more subtle and is part of a series of societal controls and 'normalizing' influences through historical institutions and definitions of normal vs. abnormal. Foucault once characterized power as "an action over actions" (une action sur des actions), arguing that power was essentially a relation between several dots, in continuous transformation as in Friedrich Nietzsche's philosophy. His view of power lent credence to the view that power in human society was part of a training process in which everyone, from a prime minister to a homeless person, played their role within the power structure of society. Jürgen Habermas opposed himself to Foucault's conception of discourse as a battlefield for power relations, arguing that it should be possible to achieve consensus on the fundamentals rules of discourse, in order to establish a transparent and democratic dialogue. Thenceforth, he argued against Foucault and Louis Althusser that power was not immanent to discourse, and that philosophy could be completely
distinguished from ideology. Constituents of power To have power an someone must be able to make a knowing decision and it must be carried out. Power therefore needs information and the authority to follow through. The simple formula Information with Authority permits the exercise of Power applies.If you know but cannot do then you have no power, except to provide information to someone who 'can do' who in turn will be powerful. If you can do, but do not know' then anything done will be in ignorance and will only achieve your ends by luck, and in most cases will bring unintended and nearly always unwished for results.Democracy is the best way to bring information and authority together because it maximises political power by bringing together its vital constituents. Power and Luck More recently, there has been a move among academics to differentiate power from a new concept of luck . Under some conditions (particularly the when examining the third dimension of power) it becomes necessary to determine who obtains a favourable result through the wielding of genuine power and who is simply "lucky". An example might be an ethnic minority who receive favourable treatment while not intentionally seeking it. A person promoted through positive discrimination would be considered "lucky" rather than "powerful". The eventual aim of such discrimination would be to eventually convert some (or all) of that luck into power. Some groups remain serially lucky without ever obtaining power.2 Alliances and coalitions When people band together into coalitions they become more powerful. 'Together we stand, divided we fall', as they say. The trick with coalitions is to build a core idea around which people cluster. This may be negative, for example stopping a hated change, or may be positive, such as pushing through a change. Favors and back scratching Political power often is build on a system of exchange, where people in a power relationship support one another as needed and perhaps in different ways (possibly even by breaking the rules). Bribery, blackmail and corruption Politics can indeed have a shadow side to it, and such negative means may be gained to garner power. A surprising number of people have skeletons and more in their closet. Digging out the dirt is a popular political ploy. What you do with it next depends on your style. A political animal will hide the information. A politically naive person will squander the power it could give, either by not talking about it or by turning it into office gossip.
2 I.C. MacMillan (1978) Strategy Formulation: political concepts, St Paul, MN, West Publishing;
